Crisis readiness and leadership under pressure

Choose the result your organization needs.

Oakley Leadership Solutions offers three scoped engagements that assess, rehearse, and improve how leaders decide, act, and communicate under pressure. Each ends with a written result and actionable next steps.

01

Crisis Readiness Diagnostic

Know where decisions and communication could fail before an incident tests them.

What we do

A focused review of a selected incident type, leadership interviews, relevant plans and policies, and a structured discussion of authority, fact flow, employee guidance, and stakeholder communication.

What you receive

A confidential gap report, 3P Readiness Action Plan, and one-page Evidence of Readiness Summary. The summary names reviewed sources, strengths, gaps, missing evidence, owners, and a proposed exercise. Performance remains untested.

Best fit: For a sponsor who needs a credible baseline and a practical starting point.

Discuss this engagement
02

3P Under Pressure™ Simulation

See how a cross-functional team handles a realistic test of its decisions and handoffs.

What we do

Sponsor scoping, an agreed scenario and observable objectives, role and fact-flow preparation, facilitated injects, observation, and a structured debrief. The scenario can address a public-sector controversy, service disruption, or internal workplace incident.

What you receive

An after-action report, 3P Readiness Action Plan, and one-page Evidence of Readiness Summary documenting observed behavior, strengths, gaps, corrective actions, owners, and retest priorities within the exercise conditions.

Best fit: For an organization ready to rehearse its current arrangements and identify what to change.

Discuss this engagement
03

Crisis Readiness Program

Move from a baseline to practiced, accountable improvement.

What we do

The diagnostic, targeted 3P training, a tailored simulation, executive readout, and scheduled 30/60/90-day follow-up on selected corrective actions. One-, two-, or three-day class formats are chosen to fit the objectives and participants.

What you receive

Baseline gap report, role and decision tools, after-action findings, 3P Readiness Action Plan, Evidence of Readiness Summary, and a follow-up record distinguishing completed actions, selected comparable retest results, and items not retested.

Best fit: For a leadership team seeking a sustained readiness effort across functions.

Discuss this engagement

A visible handoff

Know what the evidence supports.

The Evidence of Readiness Summary pairs each agreed capability with its source and date, observation status, limitations, owner, and next proof point. The diagnostic reports reviewed evidence; the simulation reports behavior observed under its scenario conditions; the program adds selected corrective-action follow-up and a documented retest when completed. It is a scoped record of evidence, not a guarantee of future performance.

The 3P method

People. Policy. Practice.

3P Under Pressure™ closes the gap between leadership intent, employee understanding, and observed action. Organizational de-escalation reduces internal confusion, role conflict, and competing messages by clarifying authority, verifying facts, rehearsing handoffs, and aligning the response. Crisis communication is tested alongside the decisions and operations behind each message.

Explore the 3P curriculum and class formats

Other counsel

Support when an incident is already underway.

Active crisis communication counsel is scoped separately around the situation and may include fact verification, executive and spokesperson preparation, employee and stakeholder updates, and recovery communication. A preparedness engagement does not include on-call response unless expressly agreed.

Start with a self-check

Use the free scorecard to frame a conversation.

The 12-question self-check highlights areas to discuss. A facilitated diagnostic reviews evidence and produces findings specific to your organization.

Take the self-check

Crisis readiness and leadership under pressure

Clarify who decides, what is verified, and how the organization acts before pressure tests it.

Discuss your readiness